Part 2 of To Earth and Back, featuring Chris McKay, Planetary scientist, NASA Ames Research Center, addressing the past and present abilities of Mars to harbor life.
(TRT 8:46)
by Gary Niederhoff on May 21, 2012
Part 2 of To Earth and Back, featuring Chris McKay, Planetary scientist, NASA Ames Research Center, addressing the past and present abilities of Mars to harbor life.
(TRT 8:46)
Tagged as: astrobiology, exploration
The latest planets turned up by NASA's Kepler telescope are -- like the kids in Lake Wobegon -- gratifyingly above average. These new worlds offer both promise and insights, because they've got traits that are both appealing and mildly disconcerting.... (read more)
{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }
Greetings! If for some reason humanity in general were to conclude that it is most likely that there is metabolizing life of a large or small range of size and intelligence on other planets, what are the justifications for spending such resources, public or non, for the search? For instance, after my own lay research into the question, I’ve settled with the opinion that E.T.L. is more likely than it is not. So personally, I don’t really have a good argument for continuing the search if the rest of us humans were able to accept we are probably not alone, therefore we are not so special, therefore…; etc. This is not a barbed question. Just curious to hear what others have to say.